Dog-and-Pony Show: How a Congressman Expects to Solve Bark-Beetle Infestations
Check this piece out from Char Miller on bark beetles.
More on the trade perspective when I return.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Benedict’s Corner
Recommended Comment Considerations
Recent Comments
Recent Posts
- Wiretap ruling could haunt environmental lawsuits
- University of Calgary Study on Human Impacts on Ecosystems
- Xcel Energy seeks power from forest waste in Colorado
- OIG Report: A Snapshot into ESA and Science
- 2014 USFS Budget: A Decrease of $116 Million for Hazardous Fuels?
- Tongass Futures Roundtable Collaborative Group Shutting Down
- Judge: USFS Must Consult with US FWS to Protect 10 Million Acres of Lynx Critical Habitat
- True Nature: Revising Ideas On What is Pristine and Wild
- Dialogue in an Era of Divisiveness: ACR 2013 Conference
- Wisconsin wildfire started by logging operations destroys 17 homes
Contacts
Purpose
Disclaimer
Top Views
- Judge: USFS Must Consult with US FWS to Protect 10 Million Acres of Lynx Critical Habitat
- Xcel Energy seeks power from forest waste in Colorado
- OIG Report: A Snapshot into ESA and Science
- 2014 USFS Budget: A Decrease of $116 Million for Hazardous Fuels?
- True Nature: Revising Ideas On What is Pristine and Wild
Archives
Science Policy Quote of the Month
"In the real world, many risks we face present neither the great certainties we would need to use cost-benefit analysis effectively nor the almost complete uncertainties that would justify radical precautionary approaches. Moreover, neither the precautionary principle nor cost-benefit analysis tell us anything about the role of democracy in making policy decisions.
I am currently working to develop new approaches rooted in deliberative democracy which might move beyond both strict cost-benefit and knee-jerk precaution toward processes that could achieve better public participation and greater political legitimacy on the major environmental threats to our future."
Jonathan Gilligan, Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences on his website here.
On Learning Through Blogging
Tags
Blogroll
Forest Service Miscellany
References
Science Policy
Species Diversity/Viability
The West
Post Categories
- 2012 Planning Rule
- 21st Century Problems
- Access
- Accountability
- adaptive management
- Advice for Administration
- Agency Efficiencies
- Alaska Issues
- All Lands
- Appeals and Objections
- Bark Beetles
- Best available science
- Biomass
- Blog -Workin' It
- Budget
- Building Trust
- Business of Land Management
- Certification
- climate change
- collaboration and public involvement
- Communication
- Community Forest Management
- conflict resolution
- Congress
- Cool Technologies
- CREATE
- District of the Week
- Diversity and species conservation
- Economics and Economic Recovery
- Ecosystem Services
- Energy
- Environmental Organizations
- ESA
- Fire and Fuels
- Forest Products
- Forest Service: Culture, History, Morale, Organization, Future
- Future (Imagining our Mutual)
- GE Trees
- Good Things
- Grasslands
- Grazing
- History
- Humans and the Environment
- Interior West
- Invasives
- Jobs
- Lands
- Landscape Scale
- Law Enforcement
- Law Review
- Litigation
- Meetings of Interest
- Monitoring
- National Reserve Conservation Assocation
- Natural Resources
- Naturalist Interest
- NEPA
- Objections
- Old Growth
- Partizanizing Issues
- People's Database
- Photos
- Place-Based Bills & Agreements
- Planning
- Planning Rule Development Process
- Politics
- Press
- Privatization
- Projects of Interest
- Proposed Rule
- Recreation
- Reform and Enhance Litigation and Appeals
- Renewable energy- wind and solar
- Research
- Responses to NOI
- Restoration
- Roadless
- Role of local and state governments
- Role of science
- Sacred Sites
- Science Process Redesign
- Science- The Business of
- special forest products
- State and Federal Forests
- Stewardship
- Sustainable Rural Economies
- timber
- Travel Management
- Tree diseases and insects
- Trust Managaement
- Uncategorized
- Water
- What Should Plans Do?
- Wilderness
- Wood
- workforce
The link didn’t work but, I found it elsewhere.
http://www.kcet.org/updaily/the_back_forty/commentary/golden-green/rob-bishops-dog-and-pony-show.html
It seems that Miller wants to “preserve” the controversy through partisan politics. Surely, Bishop needs better “coaching” on what to say, and how to say it. However, there is no mention of those on the other side of the aisle (particularly the eastern Democrats), who favor doing nothing at all, and continue to push for new massive Wilderness. Dead forests simply are not suitable for recreation or as “wildlife corridors”.
This is garbage.
Derek,
Care to elaborate? When I read your remark, I thought of a thought experiment wherein one writes on both sides of a single page: “The statement on the other side of this page is false!” The two statements frame a logical contradiction. But I thought of it differently, this way: Since you provide no reference, I presume that what you wrote is self-referential. That is, your comment, devoid of content or context is itself “garbage.”
[Note: I updated this, and embellished on my cryptic three-word-comment to better frame my intent on trying to get you to elaborate.]