Advisory Committee Named

From SE Agnet here.

WASHINGTON, June 5, 2012–Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today named the members of an advisory committee charged with providing guidance and recommendations on the implementation of the new U.S. Forest Service Planning Rule.

“Members of this federal advisory committee will give unique perspectives on land management issues under the new planning rule, which provides stronger protections for forests, water, and wildlife while supporting the economic vitality of rural communities,” said Vilsack. “The committee’s input will be very important as we begin to implement the new rule and address critical management needs on our national forests and grasslands.”

More than 220 people applied to serve on the committee, making for a demanding selection process. The selected members represent a balanced range of public interests in the management of National Forest System lands, as well as a diversity of backgrounds, communities, and geographic locations. This group will be able provide the Secretary of Agriculture and the U.S. Forest Service Chief with feedback on a range of issues important to implementation of the planning rule.

“The members of this committee collectively bring to the table a vast amount of knowledge, passion and interest in our national forests and grasslands,” said U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell. “Forming this committee continues the commitment to public involvement and collaboration that has guided us throughout this landmark rulemaking process.”

While only 21 applicants could be selected for the committee, the Forest Service will continue to engage the public in a number of ways as the new rule is implemented. Opportunities will include participating in the early adopter forest plan revision efforts and commenting on the proposed planning directives when they are released for public comment. Meetings of the federal advisory committee are also open to the public.

The committee’s scope of work will include the ability to make recommendations on directives relating to the Planning Rule, effective monitoring and evaluation methods, and suggestions for increased collaboration efforts.

Federal advisory committee members are as follows:

Representing the public at-large

Howard Raymond Vaughan, Montgomery, Ala.
Vickie Roberts, Shelton Roberts Properties, Winona, Miss.
Representing American Indian Tribes

William Barquin, Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Portland, Ore.
Representing commercial or recreational hunting and fishing

Daniel Dessecker, Ruffed Grouse Society, Rice Lake, Wis.
Representing conservation organizations or watershed associations

Christopher Topik, The Nature Conservancy, Vienna, Va.
Stephan Kandell, Trout Unlimited, Durango, Colo.
Susan Jane Brown, Blue Mountain Forest Partners, Portland, Ore.
Representing county or local elected officials

Joan May, San Miguel County Commissioner, Telluride, Colo.
Robert Cope, Lemhi County Commissioner, Salmon, Idaho
Representing developed outdoor or commercial recreation

Russell Ehnes, National Off-Highway Vehicle Conservation Council, Great Falls, Mont.
Representing dispersed recreation

Adam Cramer, Outdoor Alliance, Bethesda, Md.
Representing energy and mineral development

Greg Schaefer, Arch Coal, Inc., Gillette, Wyo.
Representing national, regional or local environmental organizations

Mike Anderson, The Wilderness Society, Seattle, Wash.
Peter Nelson, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C.
Representing private landowners/grazing

James Magagna, Wyoming Stock Growers Association, Rock Springs, Wyo.
Lorenzo Valdez, Youngsville Cattlemen Association, Fairview, N.M.
Representing the scientific community

Wally Covington, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz.
Representing state-elected officials

Rodney Stokes, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, East Lansing, Mich.
Representing the timber industry

Tom Troxel, Intermountain Timber Association, Rapid City, S.D.
Pamela Motley, West Range Reclamation, LLC, Hotchkiss, Colorado
Representing youth

Candice Price, Urban American Outdoors, Kansas City, Mo.

Visit the agency’s planning rule website for more information about the committee, the new planning rule, and upcoming opportunities for public engagement.

In March, Vilsack announced USDA’s final Planning Rule for America’s 193 million-acre National Forest System that includes stronger protections for forests, water, and wildlife while supporting the economic vitality of rural communities. USDA and the Forest Service carefully considered more than a quarter million comments to develop the final rule, which emphasizes collaboration, sound science and protections for land, water and wildlife.

USDA works with state, local, and Tribal governments and private landowners to conserve and protect our nation’s natural resources – helping preserve our land and clean our air and water. President Obama launched the America’s Great Outdoors initiative in 2010 to foster a 21st century approach to conservation that is designed by and accomplished in partnership with the American people. During the past two years, USDA’s conservation agencies — the U.S. Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the Farm Service Agency — have delivered technical assistance and implemented restoration practices on public and private lands. USDA is working to better target conservation investments by embracing locally driven conservation and entering partnerships that focus on large, landscape-scale conservation.

The mission of the U.S. Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. Recreational activities on our lands contribute $14.5 billion annually to the U.S. economy. The agency manages 193 million acres of public land, provides assistance to state and private landowners, and maintains the largest forestry research organization in the world.

4FRI Update: Arizona Forest Restoration Products Inc. Statement

Yesterday, Arizona Forest Restoration Products Inc. released this statement regarding the Forest Service’s decision to award a massive 300,000 acre timber harvesting contract as part of the Four Forests Restoration Initiative (4FRI) in Arizona to an under-the-radar Montana timber corporation represented by a retired Forest Service official.

A collection of all the posts and comments on this blog related to the 4FRI can be found here.

To Burn (Prescribed) or Not to Burn; That is the Question

Some of you may remember that we sheltered evacuees of the human and feline persuasion at our house during the North Fork Fire. Of course, during that period I overheard conversations all the time (at the hair salon, library) about “what they should have done” from folks who have never dealt with fire, prescribed or suppression.

When I first heard of this fire, my first response was “there, but for the grace of Gaia, go we.”

Here’s an op-ed today from the Denver Post with the views of some residents.

Now, a review was done by some FS folks that found no fault by the State. As a Colorado taxpayer, I am having some trouble with the homeowners’ quest to get into my pockets in the name of “justice.” I’m also concerned that this could happen with future (perceived, disputed and litigated?) “errors” in suppression.. leading to liabilities, one way or the other, that states can ill afford in this economic climate.

How can we live in a fire-adapted landscape, protect people and communities, and have the appropriate people (whoever they are) take the risks, do the dangerous work, and pay the bills?

Guest Commentary: What is the state’s responsibility in the Lower North Fork fire?

By Scott Appel and Tom Scanlan

Two months ago, a wildfire set by the Colorado State Forest Service burned 23 homes to the ground and tragically killed three of our loved ones, friends and neighbors. A so-called “controlled burn” quickly flared out of control, and within hours on a Monday afternoon, destroyed everything our families built up over a lifetime.

The physical decimation of our personal items and property pales in comparison to the loss of the lives of Ann Appel and Sam and Linda Lucas to their families and our community. Their deaths and the fire’s total devastation is horrific — and was completely avoidable. As residents of the now-ashen Kuehster Road community, we are grateful that Gov. John Hickenlooper and the state legislature acted to amend the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act to include a waiver for prescribed burns, which was signed Monday. This is a common-sense amendment and a step toward justice, not only for the victims of the Lower North Fork fire but also for all Colorado citizens who may in the future be similarly impacted.

However, the signing of this bill is only a preliminary action toward the state taking full responsibility for the devastation it has wreaked. This legislation is imperfect because it promises nothing more than an “avenue to seek compensation,” lacking any assurances that we will be compensated for our losses not covered by insurance. The legislation says only what the state can do, but does not say what the state will do.

We know exactly how this tragedy was brought upon us, yet we are faced with the feeling that the burden of proof is on us, having to endure a complex governmental review process before recommendations are made for restitution. The amendment makes no promises for the time frame of this process, or that any reasonable compensation will be awarded to victims. In the meantime, our bills and obligations continue.

We have spent the last two months sifting through ashes, testifying before the state legislature, working with our elected representatives to get the state to take responsibility for its actions. Serious questions remain surrounding why this fire was set under dangerously dry conditions when weather reports predicted high winds; why the state ignored its own protocols by leaving the burn unattended; why an evacuation wasn’t ordered earlier when it was already known the fire was out of control; and why the reverse 911 call system failed to warn people in harm’s way.

Moreover, the state’s own review of the fire failed to consult any of the families that lost their homes or numerous witnesses of the fire.

The Kuehster Road community is made up of responsible citizens who pay our taxes and look out for ourselves and our neighbors. We practice fire mitigation through state-recommended guidance to minimize the possibility of forest fires. It’s a far cry from justice when the state Forest Service runs away from taking responsibility for its actions.

We have never asked the state of Colorado for anything. We are not asking for a handout now, but we shouldn’t have to continue to fight for justice as we try to rebuild our lives from this tragedy. Coloradans understand fairness, and what it means to correct a horrible injustice. We sincerely appreciate the outpouring of sympathy from our fellow citizens, who instinctively know how wrong this was.

We are grateful to the governor and our other elected leaders for putting forth this legislation. The governor has personally promised us that this process would not get bogged down in a partisan politics, and we hope and trust that he can prevent it.

We call upon all our elected officials and state agencies to ensure that with the signing of this legislation, they too are fully committed to a quick and just resolution of this tragedy. We ask the state to act as expeditiously and fairly as the state insurance commission would require of any private party who had caused similar harm.

Scott Appel is the husband of Ann Appel, who died in the Lower North Fork Fire. Tom Scanlan is retired from the U.S. Air Force. They wrote this piece on behalf of the residents of the Kuehster Road community.

Note from Sharon: I personally know and respect the team leader of the FS review team. In all these high emotions and complex conditions of nature and humans, I don’t believe that we have anything else to fall back on but the personal integrity of experienced individuals.