Cool Video on Pacific Northwest National Forests
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Benedict’s Corner
Recommended Comment Considerations
Recent Comments
Recent Posts
- Public Employees Sue Over ‘Political Deals’ Behind Wolf Delisting
- Toxic Mess: EPA places former Missoula Co papermill on National Priorities List
- House farm bill offers NEPA exclusions to combat beetle infestations
- Wolf Scientists Howl About Wolf Delisting
- If not at Maroon Bells, Then Where? Or Predicting Poopy Trailheads
- Wiretap ruling could haunt environmental lawsuits
- University of Calgary Study on Human Impacts on Ecosystems
- Xcel Energy seeks power from forest waste in Colorado
- OIG Report: A Snapshot into ESA and Science
- 2014 USFS Budget: A Decrease of $116 Million for Hazardous Fuels?
Contacts
Purpose
Disclaimer
Top Views
- Wolf Scientists Howl About Wolf Delisting
- Judge: USFS Must Consult with US FWS to Protect 10 Million Acres of Lynx Critical Habitat
- If not at Maroon Bells, Then Where? Or Predicting Poopy Trailheads
- Wiretap ruling could haunt environmental lawsuits
- House farm bill offers NEPA exclusions to combat beetle infestations
Archives
Science Policy Quote of the Month
"In the real world, many risks we face present neither the great certainties we would need to use cost-benefit analysis effectively nor the almost complete uncertainties that would justify radical precautionary approaches. Moreover, neither the precautionary principle nor cost-benefit analysis tell us anything about the role of democracy in making policy decisions.
I am currently working to develop new approaches rooted in deliberative democracy which might move beyond both strict cost-benefit and knee-jerk precaution toward processes that could achieve better public participation and greater political legitimacy on the major environmental threats to our future."
Jonathan Gilligan, Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences on his website here.
On Learning Through Blogging
Tags
Blogroll
Forest Service Miscellany
References
Science Policy
Species Diversity/Viability
The West
Post Categories
- 2012 Planning Rule
- 21st Century Problems
- Access
- Accountability
- adaptive management
- Advice for Administration
- Agency Efficiencies
- Alaska Issues
- All Lands
- Appeals and Objections
- Bark Beetles
- Best available science
- Biomass
- Blog -Workin' It
- Budget
- Building Trust
- Business of Land Management
- Certification
- climate change
- collaboration and public involvement
- Communication
- Community Forest Management
- conflict resolution
- Congress
- Cool Technologies
- CREATE
- District of the Week
- Diversity and species conservation
- Economics and Economic Recovery
- Ecosystem Services
- Energy
- Environmental Organizations
- ESA
- Fire and Fuels
- Forest Products
- Forest Service: Culture, History, Morale, Organization, Future
- Future (Imagining our Mutual)
- GE Trees
- Good Things
- Grasslands
- Grazing
- History
- Humans and the Environment
- Interior West
- Invasives
- Jobs
- Lands
- Landscape Scale
- Law Enforcement
- Law Review
- Litigation
- Meetings of Interest
- Monitoring
- National Reserve Conservation Assocation
- Natural Resources
- Naturalist Interest
- NEPA
- Objections
- Old Growth
- Partizanizing Issues
- People's Database
- Photos
- Place-Based Bills & Agreements
- Planning
- Planning Rule Development Process
- Politics
- Press
- Privatization
- Projects of Interest
- Proposed Rule
- Recreation
- Reform and Enhance Litigation and Appeals
- Renewable energy- wind and solar
- Research
- Responses to NOI
- Restoration
- Roadless
- Role of local and state governments
- Role of science
- Sacred Sites
- Science Process Redesign
- Science- The Business of
- special forest products
- State and Federal Forests
- Stewardship
- Sustainable Rural Economies
- timber
- Travel Management
- Tree diseases and insects
- Trust Managaement
- Uncategorized
- Water
- What Should Plans Do?
- Wilderness
- Wood
- workforce

Super cool…thanks for sharing Sharon.
Very nice, especially for something produced by the Forest Service. It’s amazing that they can showcase the values like this, and then proceed to do dumb projects that degrade those values with logging, grazing, roads, and OHVs.
I hate to say it, but I am surprised that the USFS put out something this nice. I would like to see more of this. I don’t just mean photos and videos either; I would like to see the USFS take an interest in quality of presentation across the board.
I wonder if a USFS employee with an interest in photography pushed this through on their own, or if this was commissioned by leadership. I also wonder how much resistance there was to putting Lightroom on a USFS computer, assuming a USFS computer was used for editing.
To end on a positive note: this is great, I hope to see more!