The Difference Between a Chinook and a Verthol.
A Chinook could lift a 16-footer…
A Verthol cannot!
A well-known helicopter logging company sent their Chinook away before they remembered that this huge sugar pine log needed to be removed from the streamcourse. I watched and took a series of photos documenting how this situation would pan out. While I was there, the Verthol couldn’t quite get one of those pieces into the air. They decided to try again in the morning, when they could get more lift.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Benedict’s Corner
Recommended Comment Considerations
Recent Comments
Recent Posts
- Dialogue in an Era of Divisiveness: ACR 2013 Conference
- Wisconsin wildfire started by logging operations destroys 17 homes
- Kissing the Past Gently Good-bye
- Buffalo Nightmare: 3 Days of Taxpayer-Funded Yellowstone Helicopter Hazing
- How Feminism Wrecked the US Forest Service
- US boom transforming global oil trade
- Colorado: Green Industries With Wood
- Court Upholds Forest Plan for Black Hills
- Lawsuit filed against Kootenai National Forest logging project
- Oregon Laws Proposed to Punish Logging Protesters
Contacts
Purpose
Disclaimer
Top Views
Archives
Science Policy Quote of the Month
"In the real world, many risks we face present neither the great certainties we would need to use cost-benefit analysis effectively nor the almost complete uncertainties that would justify radical precautionary approaches. Moreover, neither the precautionary principle nor cost-benefit analysis tell us anything about the role of democracy in making policy decisions.
I am currently working to develop new approaches rooted in deliberative democracy which might move beyond both strict cost-benefit and knee-jerk precaution toward processes that could achieve better public participation and greater political legitimacy on the major environmental threats to our future."
Jonathan Gilligan, Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences on his website here.
On Learning Through Blogging
Tags
Blogroll
Forest Service Miscellany
References
Science Policy
Species Diversity/Viability
The West
Post Categories
- 2012 Planning Rule
- 21st Century Problems
- Access
- Accountability
- adaptive management
- Advice for Administration
- Agency Efficiencies
- Alaska Issues
- All Lands
- Appeals and Objections
- Bark Beetles
- Best available science
- Biomass
- Blog -Workin' It
- Budget
- Building Trust
- Business of Land Management
- Certification
- climate change
- collaboration and public involvement
- Communication
- Community Forest Management
- conflict resolution
- Congress
- Cool Technologies
- CREATE
- District of the Week
- Diversity and species conservation
- Economics and Economic Recovery
- Ecosystem Services
- Energy
- Environmental Organizations
- ESA
- Fire and Fuels
- Forest Products
- Forest Service: Culture, History, Morale, Organization, Future
- Future (Imagining our Mutual)
- GE Trees
- Good Things
- Grasslands
- Grazing
- History
- Humans and the Environment
- Interior West
- Invasives
- Jobs
- Lands
- Landscape Scale
- Law Enforcement
- Law Review
- Litigation
- Meetings of Interest
- Monitoring
- National Reserve Conservation Assocation
- Natural Resources
- Naturalist Interest
- NEPA
- Objections
- Old Growth
- Partizanizing Issues
- People's Database
- Photos
- Place-Based Bills & Agreements
- Planning
- Planning Rule Development Process
- Politics
- Press
- Privatization
- Projects of Interest
- Proposed Rule
- Recreation
- Reform and Enhance Litigation and Appeals
- Renewable energy- wind and solar
- Research
- Responses to NOI
- Restoration
- Roadless
- Role of local and state governments
- Role of science
- Sacred Sites
- Science Process Redesign
- Science- The Business of
- special forest products
- State and Federal Forests
- Stewardship
- Sustainable Rural Economies
- timber
- Travel Management
- Tree diseases and insects
- Trust Managaement
- Uncategorized
- Water
- What Should Plans Do?
- Wilderness
- Wood
- workforce

Huge logs and logging debris in a stream channel! It was just “forgotten?” Why did that tree end up in the stream channel in the first place?
This pic and situation exactly illustrates why some folks are so rabidly anti-logging. I am sure that the logging plans explicitly directly that nothing like this would be allowed. But it happens, and it happens all the time. People are human and make mistakes in my experience, but too often the damage can’t be undone, although maybe not in this specific case. And I won’t even venture to ask why this large tree (old growth?) was cut in the first place.
This was from my Fire salvage project. The tree was reasonably dead (still had some green needles but, I wasn’t the one who marked it), and was felled sidehill. Maybe the faller should have felled it in a slightly different direction, as when the top logs were bucked, the bulk of the tree rolled and slid down into this intermittent creek. The need to remove the log was documented, and they had plenty of time to get the log out, while they still had the Chinook.
Despite this little glitch, I had generally good results from Columbia Helicopters. I was lucky to have a young, eager manager, willing to clean up the messes they made. They sure had to spend a lot of money doing their landing cleanup.
The massive sugar pine was “reasonably dead.” Gotta love it! I’m sure the tree made better lumber than habitat or soil anyway. And it likely put a large amount of cash into the pockets of the logging contractor.
Judging from the excess snags still contained within the project area, I’m “reasonably sure” that the tree would have been just another snag, if it hadn’t been cut. It sure didn’t put a lot of money into Columbia’s pockets, as it took at least three attempts to get the log out of the creek. I can’t say that the tree met the marking guidelines, since it was already on the ground when I took the sale over. I’m pretty sure it still had some green on it, though. Large sugar pines do make good “hard” snags. It was also close enough to a road to be considered a hazard tree. Despite salvage logging, there is still ample “habitat” in the form of snags.