Oregon Field Guide: Biscuit Fire 10 Years Later
The most recent episode of Oregon Field Guide, produced by Oregon Public Broadcasting, takes a look at southwestern Oregon’s Biscuit Fire 10 years after the 2002 wildfire. You can watch the ten minute program here and then offer your thoughts in the comments section.
Bernard Bormann, with the Pacific Northwest Research station, had been studying the forests’ of the Siskiyou mountains for years. When the 500,000 acre Biscuit fire burned through his research plots, he first thought all was lost. But in the 10 years since the fire, he’s been able to compare life before and after fire to reveal an amazing amount of new information about how life returns to the forest after fire.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Benedict’s Corner
Recommended Comment Considerations
Recent Comments
Recent Posts
- Public Employees Sue Over ‘Political Deals’ Behind Wolf Delisting
- Toxic Mess: EPA places former Missoula Co papermill on National Priorities List
- House farm bill offers NEPA exclusions to combat beetle infestations
- Wolf Scientists Howl About Wolf Delisting
- If not at Maroon Bells, Then Where? Or Predicting Poopy Trailheads
- Wiretap ruling could haunt environmental lawsuits
- University of Calgary Study on Human Impacts on Ecosystems
- Xcel Energy seeks power from forest waste in Colorado
- OIG Report: A Snapshot into ESA and Science
- 2014 USFS Budget: A Decrease of $116 Million for Hazardous Fuels?
Contacts
Purpose
Disclaimer
Top Views
- Wolf Scientists Howl About Wolf Delisting
- Judge: USFS Must Consult with US FWS to Protect 10 Million Acres of Lynx Critical Habitat
- If not at Maroon Bells, Then Where? Or Predicting Poopy Trailheads
- Wiretap ruling could haunt environmental lawsuits
- House farm bill offers NEPA exclusions to combat beetle infestations
Archives
Science Policy Quote of the Month
"In the real world, many risks we face present neither the great certainties we would need to use cost-benefit analysis effectively nor the almost complete uncertainties that would justify radical precautionary approaches. Moreover, neither the precautionary principle nor cost-benefit analysis tell us anything about the role of democracy in making policy decisions.
I am currently working to develop new approaches rooted in deliberative democracy which might move beyond both strict cost-benefit and knee-jerk precaution toward processes that could achieve better public participation and greater political legitimacy on the major environmental threats to our future."
Jonathan Gilligan, Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences on his website here.
On Learning Through Blogging
Tags
Blogroll
Forest Service Miscellany
References
Science Policy
Species Diversity/Viability
The West
Post Categories
- 2012 Planning Rule
- 21st Century Problems
- Access
- Accountability
- adaptive management
- Advice for Administration
- Agency Efficiencies
- Alaska Issues
- All Lands
- Appeals and Objections
- Bark Beetles
- Best available science
- Biomass
- Blog -Workin' It
- Budget
- Building Trust
- Business of Land Management
- Certification
- climate change
- collaboration and public involvement
- Communication
- Community Forest Management
- conflict resolution
- Congress
- Cool Technologies
- CREATE
- District of the Week
- Diversity and species conservation
- Economics and Economic Recovery
- Ecosystem Services
- Energy
- Environmental Organizations
- ESA
- Fire and Fuels
- Forest Products
- Forest Service: Culture, History, Morale, Organization, Future
- Future (Imagining our Mutual)
- GE Trees
- Good Things
- Grasslands
- Grazing
- History
- Humans and the Environment
- Interior West
- Invasives
- Jobs
- Lands
- Landscape Scale
- Law Enforcement
- Law Review
- Litigation
- Meetings of Interest
- Monitoring
- National Reserve Conservation Assocation
- Natural Resources
- Naturalist Interest
- NEPA
- Objections
- Old Growth
- Partizanizing Issues
- People's Database
- Photos
- Place-Based Bills & Agreements
- Planning
- Planning Rule Development Process
- Politics
- Press
- Privatization
- Projects of Interest
- Proposed Rule
- Recreation
- Reform and Enhance Litigation and Appeals
- Renewable energy- wind and solar
- Research
- Responses to NOI
- Restoration
- Roadless
- Role of local and state governments
- Role of science
- Sacred Sites
- Science Process Redesign
- Science- The Business of
- special forest products
- State and Federal Forests
- Stewardship
- Sustainable Rural Economies
- timber
- Travel Management
- Tree diseases and insects
- Trust Managaement
- Uncategorized
- Water
- What Should Plans Do?
- Wilderness
- Wood
- workforce

With 500,000 acres burned, You’re bound to find a piece of land that didn’t suffer so much. On the other hand, you’re also bound to find precious nest trees, dead and horizontal. How many former habitats remain unoccupied, after 10 years now? How many roads have slumped or slid? How many salmon spawning areas are now unusable? How much old growth was killed?
How much of this is the Silver Complex, which blew up 25 years ago and is now being passed as simply “the Biscuit Fire?” There’s a big difference between the two landscapes, and both areas need to address the questions Larry is asking — but the USFS consistently refuses to do so, Donato. I think the Supervisor that was there stonewalling everything and letting it burn and rot is retiring, so that’s good. Maybe put someone in with some restoration experience and get local people back to work? Nah. It would be litigated.