Giant Sequoia Plantation!
We ran across this Giant Sequoia plantation, within our restoration project. I’m not sure of the age of this plantation but, it was probably back in the late 70′s or early 80′s. It is mostly south-facing, and not really like where they normally grow but, a “renegade” culturist did several experiments. I’m not sure what future management ideas are. This one needs some thinning, as their vitality seems quite variable.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Benedict’s Corner
Recommended Comment Considerations
Recent Comments
Recent Posts
- Wiretap ruling could haunt environmental lawsuits
- University of Calgary Study on Human Impacts on Ecosystems
- Xcel Energy seeks power from forest waste in Colorado
- OIG Report: A Snapshot into ESA and Science
- 2014 USFS Budget: A Decrease of $116 Million for Hazardous Fuels?
- Tongass Futures Roundtable Collaborative Group Shutting Down
- Judge: USFS Must Consult with US FWS to Protect 10 Million Acres of Lynx Critical Habitat
- True Nature: Revising Ideas On What is Pristine and Wild
- Dialogue in an Era of Divisiveness: ACR 2013 Conference
- Wisconsin wildfire started by logging operations destroys 17 homes
Contacts
Purpose
Disclaimer
Top Views
- Judge: USFS Must Consult with US FWS to Protect 10 Million Acres of Lynx Critical Habitat
- 2014 USFS Budget: A Decrease of $116 Million for Hazardous Fuels?
- True Nature: Revising Ideas On What is Pristine and Wild
- Tongass Futures Roundtable Collaborative Group Shutting Down
- Xcel Energy seeks power from forest waste in Colorado
Archives
Science Policy Quote of the Month
"In the real world, many risks we face present neither the great certainties we would need to use cost-benefit analysis effectively nor the almost complete uncertainties that would justify radical precautionary approaches. Moreover, neither the precautionary principle nor cost-benefit analysis tell us anything about the role of democracy in making policy decisions.
I am currently working to develop new approaches rooted in deliberative democracy which might move beyond both strict cost-benefit and knee-jerk precaution toward processes that could achieve better public participation and greater political legitimacy on the major environmental threats to our future."
Jonathan Gilligan, Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences on his website here.
On Learning Through Blogging
Tags
Blogroll
Forest Service Miscellany
References
Science Policy
Species Diversity/Viability
The West
Post Categories
- 2012 Planning Rule
- 21st Century Problems
- Access
- Accountability
- adaptive management
- Advice for Administration
- Agency Efficiencies
- Alaska Issues
- All Lands
- Appeals and Objections
- Bark Beetles
- Best available science
- Biomass
- Blog -Workin' It
- Budget
- Building Trust
- Business of Land Management
- Certification
- climate change
- collaboration and public involvement
- Communication
- Community Forest Management
- conflict resolution
- Congress
- Cool Technologies
- CREATE
- District of the Week
- Diversity and species conservation
- Economics and Economic Recovery
- Ecosystem Services
- Energy
- Environmental Organizations
- ESA
- Fire and Fuels
- Forest Products
- Forest Service: Culture, History, Morale, Organization, Future
- Future (Imagining our Mutual)
- GE Trees
- Good Things
- Grasslands
- Grazing
- History
- Humans and the Environment
- Interior West
- Invasives
- Jobs
- Lands
- Landscape Scale
- Law Enforcement
- Law Review
- Litigation
- Meetings of Interest
- Monitoring
- National Reserve Conservation Assocation
- Natural Resources
- Naturalist Interest
- NEPA
- Objections
- Old Growth
- Partizanizing Issues
- People's Database
- Photos
- Place-Based Bills & Agreements
- Planning
- Planning Rule Development Process
- Politics
- Press
- Privatization
- Projects of Interest
- Proposed Rule
- Recreation
- Reform and Enhance Litigation and Appeals
- Renewable energy- wind and solar
- Research
- Responses to NOI
- Restoration
- Roadless
- Role of local and state governments
- Role of science
- Sacred Sites
- Science Process Redesign
- Science- The Business of
- special forest products
- State and Federal Forests
- Stewardship
- Sustainable Rural Economies
- timber
- Travel Management
- Tree diseases and insects
- Trust Managaement
- Uncategorized
- Water
- What Should Plans Do?
- Wilderness
- Wood
- workforce

When I was at Berkeley, I think I remember vaguely that people liked to plant GS.
I can’t remember if it was to expand the range in case of fires burning the groves? or because it grew well for timber?? Maybe others remember this better.
Lot of good info and a map in the Silvics Manual here:
I wonder if that’s still true about white fir, Larry? Given the dates of the references cited, it must have been written in the early 80′s.
There are many articles on the genetics of Sequoiadendron by Fins and Libby (my colleagues from when I also attended Berkeley). Here’s a good intro and set of links.
Certainly, white fir is overstocked, compared to historical accounts. Just by reducing the understory and intermediate white fir, we’ll still maintain plenty of oversized (and untouchable) white fir old growth. In areas where the white fir cannot invade, incense cedar will often dominate the understory. Both species, together, choke off the desired overstory trees, by “stealing” more of the surface water. Old growth pines are deep-rooted, while the fir and cedar are not. Also, both species are quite flammable, retaining large crowns, unlike the pines.
I do wonder how today’s forests would look if we hadn’t cut down so many old growth “pecky” cedar, back in the 40′s and 50′s. Back then, those “culls” were left out in the woods. The logs take decades to decay, and many still exist. An overstory of cedar and white fir would resist pine regeneration, and stand replacement fires would be severe, with few pine seed sources.